New rules and new training
With the recent introduction of the new Uniform Rules for Demand Guarantees,
URDG 758, and our development of online training on their application, I took
the opportunity to interview Dr. Georges Affaki in relation to the use and
adoption of the new rules.
Dr Georges Affaki is
Vice-Chair of the ICC Banking Commission, Chair of the URDG 758 Drafting Group
and Head of Structured Finance Legal Affairs at BNP Paribas
The following is some of the key points of our discussion...
Gary Collyer: It is just over 3 months since the URDG 758 came into
effect. Can you comment on what have been the early reactions or issues, and is
there any indication as to who may have had the honour of issuing the first URDG
758 guarantee?
Georges Affaki: Actually, we did not even wait for 1st July 2010 to
measure the acceptance of the new URDG 758 in the market. All the members of the
ICC Task Force on Guarantees moved immediately after adoption into a coordinated
promotional approach that spanned a great number of countries and all the
sectors of trade and industry. The National Committees of the ICC have been
excellent promoters of the new rules as well, raising awareness amongst their
constituencies through seminars of the advent of the rules and how their members
can take advantage of them in their demand guarantee practice. I have counted
over 50 seminars. I am also informed of countless in-house workshops on URDG
758.
The Central Bank of Iran has issued a circular letter recommending the URDG
758 to its national banks. The Organisation for the Harmonisation of Business
Law in Africa has revised its Uniform Secured Transaction Act bringing in a
number of the principles that we laid out in the new URDG. Their Act is in
effect in 17 countries in Africa. We have reached out to the World Bank and to
the International Federation of Consulting Engineers which had adopted the URDG
458 into their model guarantee form. Both are looking into bringing into their
model forms the new rules. Feedback is very positive. I am proud of the new
guarantee rules that we have offered to the world.
By sunrise of 1st July 2010, Spanish bank La Caixa had issued its first URDG 758
demand guarantee ... only to learn that Austrian bank RZB had actually issued a
URDG 758 guarantee several days before with a deferred entry into force to 1st
July 2010. Giant trade finance banks Deutsche Bank and BNP Paribas have moved
all their new URDG guarantees into the 758 universe. And it's only the
beginning.
Gary Collyer: As you are aware, article 10 of URDG 458 referred to the
guarantor having a reasonable time within which to examine a demand under a
guarantee and to decide whether to pay or refuse it. In answer to a specific
request for an opinion, the conclusion to a question on reasonable time in ICC
Opinion R621 includes "Article 10's reasonable time would in most cases be
significantly less than UCP's maximum seven banking days" [the conclusion
written during the lifetime of UCP 500]. Similarly, in opinion R. 624 it is
stated that reasonable time for the processing of a demand would be within three
banking days of receipt. Given the positions under URDG 458, can you offer some
insight into the URDG 758 referring to five business days.
Georges Affaki: Yes. One of the main objectives of the revision was to
take away imprecise, case-based standards such as "reasonable time". That was
overwhelmingly supported by all the participants to the revision.
We polled a number of major bank guarantee departments to identify the typical
duration for the examination of a demand. On average, three business days was a
maximum, with a number of ISO-certified banks having committed to one business
day. Accordingly, a first draft of the revised rules proposed three business
days for the examination. Over the next two subsequent drafts, a strong majority
supported lining up the examination period under URDG with that under UCP 600
which, as you know, is five banking days.
The argument in favour of that alignment is that many regional banks and small
and medium size companies deal with demand guarantees and letters of credit on
the same operation platform by the same staff. There was clearly a merit in
unifying the standard for the two instruments. Remember also that with the new
URDG 758 comes an obligation to indicate in the rejection notice all the
discrepancies before the expiry of the period set in the rules. Failure to do
that leads to preclusion. Hence one more resemblance with the UCP and an
additional argument to have the same examination period: five business days.
Of course, guarantors incur no liability if they were to either make payment or
reject a non-complying demand before the end of the five business day period. It
is a safe harbour if you want.
Obviously, new URDG 758 article 20(a) supersedes Opinion R624 which should be
considered as lapsed.
Gary Collyer: The URDG 758 publication includes model forms for a
guarantee and counter-guarantee that were developed by the Drafting Group. SWIFT
are now looking to produce a formatted MT760 possibly for use from Q2 2011. Is
the intention that the messages will follow the concept of the model forms and
will the Drafting Group be part of the team that will develop these formats?
Georges Affaki: The URDG 758 contain a transition rule in article 1(d):
any reference to URDG in a guarantee issued after 1 July 2010 is deemed to be a
reference to URDG 758 unless it expressly indicates URDG 458. So a party
referring to URDG in field 40C of SWIFT message 760 actually refers to URDG 758.
Nonetheless, we have asked SWIFT to consider adding 758 to the URDG box in field
40c essentially for educational and awareness purpose. I would like to add that
a number of users have asked that the very user-friendly model guarantee form
proposed in page 34 of the English copy URDG publication 758 be used as the
basis of a brand new SWIFT message type, perhaps an MT758. It is too early to
say if this will go through and when, but we will make sure that users still
have the choice to use any other message type they may want.
Gary Collyer: And finally, the million dollar question! Having seen
the rules approved, published and, now in use, is there something that you wish
you had covered in the rules but did not? Or, change something that is in the
rules where the concept could have been expanded or developed differently?
Georges Affaki: In hindsight, there are always sentences that could
have been better formulated for the purpose of clarity. For example, we could
have indicated that the rule in article 3(a) also covers the case where two
branches of the same entity act as guarantor and advising party for the same
guarantee. Nothing in the rules outlaws it, but a specific reference would --
according to feedback I got in a number of seminars -- have reassured some
doubting users. I have already taken note for the next revision in 2028!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
URDG Master – Online training in URDG 758 and Demand Guarantees

URDG Master was released to meet the increased educational requirements in the
area of Demand Guarantees following the coming into effect of the URDG 758 rules
(on 01 July 2010) and to ensure global availability of ICC approved structured
training in the application of the rules.
This 12-hour course is suitable for anyone who wishes to master the operation of
demand guarantees and the application of the new URDG 758 rules.
URDG Master “will become an indispensable tool to the application of the new
rules that are destined to become the international standard for demand
guarantee practice.” (Dr. Georges Affaki)
The course provides trainees with a solid foundation in Demand Guarantees as
well as an in-depth understanding of the application of the new Rules.
URDG Master uses interactive case studies to allow practitioners apply their
knowledge in situations simulating real life cases. The course assessment also
allows users to test their ability to apply the key areas of practice learned
within the course. On completion of the course each trainee will receive a
personalized ICC Certificate of Achievement, detailing their results.
As the training is delivered online it can be taken at any time and from any
location with Internet access.
For more information on URDG Master and for a free evaluation of the service, CLICK HERE |