Uniform Rules for Bank-to-Bank Reimbursements

New Publication Number 725 to become effective October 1, 2008

By Gary Collyer


Background to URR

The Uniform Rules for Bank-to-Bank Reimbursements ("URR") were first published by ICC in November 1995 and came into force on July 1, 1996 as ICC Publication No.525. At the time, reimbursement authorizations had begun to be issued in currencies other than what had been the more common currency i.e., US Dollars and an international set of rules were deemed necessary. It should be noted that there had been Bank-to-Bank Reimbursement rules operating in the US for many years and these formed the basis for the establishment of the principles to be considered in drafting URR 525.

From July 1, 1996 issuing banks were faced with the decision as to whether their reimbursement authorizations should be made subject to URR 525 or UCP 500 article 19. To encourage usage of the URR and reduce the possibility of any ambiguity as to the applicable rules, SWIFT modified their handbook to reflect that the issuance of an MT740 (Authorisation to Reimburse) would automatically apply to URR 525, unless otherwise stated. It is true to say that the usage of URR varies from country to country and will, no doubt, continue to do so with the updated version (URR 725) when it comes into effect on October 1, 2008. Today, the majority of credits are issued available by negotiation and the issuing bank provides reimbursement of a complying presentation at sight or on a future due date. This form of issuance negates the need for any Bank-to-Bank reimbursement instructions to appear in a credit. However, there is still scope for more Bank-to-Bank reimbursements to be subject to URR.

Changes made in URR 725

URR 725 should not be seen as a revision of URR 525. It is an updating process that has followed the same manner as the eUCP i.e., to change the style to match that of UCP 600. The changes were approved by the ICC national committees at the ICC Banking Commission in April 2008.

These changes include the removal of capitalization of terms and grammatical changes to match UCP 600 wording. As an example the (s) have been removed throughout the rules and the term honour has also been used to replace the phrase "pays, incurs a deferred payment undertaking, accepts draft(s)."

Article 1 has been changed to allow for express indication of the reimbursement authorization being subject to the rules: "?reimbursement authorization expressly indicates that it is subject to these rules". Due to this change and the wording in UCP 600 sub-article 13 (a), the previous SWIFT stance that a reimbursement authorization will automatically be subject to the version of URR in effect on the date of issue is no longer applicable. As with the MT700, issuers of an MT740 are required to indicate the applicable rules. In this case, URR LATEST VERSION or NOTURR. The use of NOTURR means that the rules stated in UCP 600 article 13 will apply.

Sub-article 6 (a) regarding the operative reimbursement authorization or amendment has been changed to reflect the UCP 600 position i.e., to remove all unnecessary reference to the circumstances where a mail confirmation to a teletransmission is sent. In all cases, the teletransmission is the operative instrument and any mail confirmation will be disregarded.

In sub-articles 6 (d) (iv) and 8 (b) the term "freely negotiable" has been changed to "credit available with any bank" so as to mirror the wording used in UCP 600 sub-article 6 (a). A new sub-article 9 (g) has been added stating "A reimbursing bank is irrevocably bound to honour a reimbursement claim as of the time it issues the reimbursement undertaking." to reflect the same concept as UCP 600 sub-articles 7 (b) (issuing bank undertaking) and 8 (b) (confirming bank undertaking). The remaining sub-articles of article 9 have been renumbered to accommodate this inclusion. The same addition has been made in sub-article 9 (h) (iii), for amendments, to reflect the same concept as UCP 600 sub-article 10 (b).

In sub-article 11 (e) the reference to reserve or indemnity has been removed. Whether or not a claiming bank has paid under indemnity or reserve does not concern a reimbursing bank. The reimbursing bank is not involved in the examination of documents, the determination of compliance nor the manner of honour or negotiation of that presentation.

It may have escaped the notice of a number of practitioners that in URR 525 sub-article 11 (e) the word "honour" was used, even though it did not appear in UCP 500. In URR 725 sub-article 11 (e) that use of the word "honour" has not been changed as it was used in a more generic sense and not in the manner that the term "honour" is defined in UCP 600.

Articles 13 (Foreign Laws and Usages), 14 (Disclaimer on the Transmission of Messages) and 15 (Force Majeure) have been changed to align the wording with UCP 600.

Article 16 on charges has been aligned with the style of UCP 600 to create the rule that a reimbursing bank?s charges are for the account of the issuing bank. This can, of course, be modified by the terms of the reimbursement authorization if such charges are to be for account of the beneficiary.

Applying URR or UCP 600 article 13?

As mentioned at the beginning of this article, the use of URR is quite sporadic and whilst a large percentage of non-usage can be attributed to the type of availability of the majority of credits, there are still a number of banks whose choice of rules remains UCP. I will not attempt to try and dissuade them from whatever views they may have of URR that gave rise to such a policy, but it is worth looking at the gaps that exist between UCP 600 article 13 and URR 725.

URR 725

Article 2 provides a list of definitions of the parties and products associated with reimbursements;

Article 3 creates the separateness of the credit and the reimbursement authorization;

Article 4 a reimbursing bank is not obligated to reimburse unless they have provided a reimbursement undertaking (see article 9);

Article 5 statement of responsibility of the issuing bank for failing to incorporate necessary information into the reimbursement authorization;

Article 6 requirements for the issuance of a reimbursement authorization (although the SWIFT MT740 will prompt completion of most of this information). Issuing bank cannot send a copy of the credit to serve as a reimbursement authorization. Form of reimbursement authorization. Requirements for pre-debit notification or pre-notification of a claim;

Article 7 reimbursing bank may disregard any expiry date that may be stated. Issuing bank must cancel their reimbursement authorization if fully or partially unutilized;

Article 8 position regarding amendments to reimbursement authorizations;

Article 9 issuance of a reimbursement undertaking, requirements for the authorization, the undertaking itself and amendments to a reimbursement undertaking;

Article 10 requirements for the reimbursement claim at sight or with a time draft to be accepted by the reimbursing bank; Article 11 maximum period for processing a reimbursement claim (3 banking days following the day of receipt of the reimbursement claim) and timing for presentation of a claim under a reimbursement due on a future date;

Article 12 effect of a duplicate reimbursement claim;

Article 13 position regarding foreign laws and usage (same position as UCP 600 sub-article 37 (d));

Article 14 position when messages, letters or documents are lost in transit, delayed or mutilated (same position as UCP600 article 35);

Article 15 liability or responsibility in a force majeure situation (same position as UCP 600 article 36);

Article 16 charges are for account of the issuing bank unless otherwise stated.

Clearly, there are aspects of a reimbursement process that are not suitably covered by UCP 600 article 13. This is a deliberate position to encourage usage of rules that are specifically designed for the product. To expand the content of UCP 600 article 13 to cover more areas of reimbursement processes would serve no useful purpose. In fact, at the time of the revision of UCP 500 one of the questions raised was whether or not the URR could be collapsed into the UCP. It was determined very early on in that process that the URR was required to remain a separate set of rules due to the reference that is made in ISP98 rule 8.04 which states "Any instruction or authorization to obtain reimbursement from another bank is subject to the International Chamber of Commerce standard rules for bank-to-bank reimbursements."

The idea of having a set of rules is to establish a sense of certainty to a transaction. URR (525 and the impending 725) seek to achieve this. The content of UCP 600 article 13 covers the bare essentials without tackling the specifics. An issuing bank may find UCP 600 article 13 as more flexible due to its lack of content, but for the sake of establishing international practice serious consideration should be given to adoption of URR 525 now and 725 from October 1, 2008.

 

Newsletter Archive

Issue 49
Overview of the draft Opinions and DOCDEX cases discussed at the April 2013 ICC Banking Commission Part 1
by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 48
Overview of the draft Opinions and DOCDEX CASES discussed at the November 2012 ICC Banking Commission PART 2
by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 47
Overview of the draft Opinions and DOCDEX CASES discussed at the November 2012 ICC Banking Commission PART 1
by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 46
The Bank Payment Obligation now a reality (Part 2)
Where we are today

by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 45
The Bank Payment Obligation now a reality (Part 1)
Where we are today

by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 44
ICC releases latest in series of Global Trade Finance Surveys
by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 43
Overview of the draft Opinions and DOCDEX CASES discussed at the March 2012 ICC Banking Commission
by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 42
International Standard Banking Practice (ISBP) its aims, its link with the UCP and its scope going forward
by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 41
Overview of the draft Opinions discussed at the October 2011 ICC Banking Commission
by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 40
A brief history of 'Presentation'
by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 39
A brief history of 'Partial drawings and shipments'
by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 38
Overview of the Opinions discussed at the March 2011 ICC Banking Commission (Part 2)
by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 37
Overview of the Opinions discussed at the March 2011 ICC Banking Commission (Part 1)
by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 36
Overview of the DOCDEX issues and Opinions discussed at the September 2010 ICC Banking Commission (Part 2)
by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 35
Overview of the DOCDEX issues and Opinions discussed at the September 2010 ICC Banking Commission (Part 1)
by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 34
URDG 758: An interview with Dr. Georges Affaki
by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 33
ICC Banking Commission Global Survey - Rethinking Trade Finance 2010
by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 32
Using ICC Tools in times of financial crisis
by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 31
Overview of the DOCDEX issues and Opinions discussed at the ICC Banking Commission
(Part 2)
by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 30
Overview of the DOCDEX issues and Opinions discussed at the November 2009 ICC Banking Commission
(Part 1)
by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 29
Is it time to have a full revision of the scope and content of ISBP?
by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 28
ICC Opinions: More Significant Than Ever?
by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 27
The curse of the 'spurious' discrepancies
by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 26
Rethinking Trade Finance 2009
by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 25
Overview of the DOCDEX issues and Opinions discussed at the ICC Banking Commission in March '09
(Part 2)
by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 24
Overview of the DOCDEX issues and Opinions discussed at the ICC Banking Commission in March '09
(Part 1)
by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 23
Overview of the DOCDEX issues and Opinions discussed at the ICC Banking Commission in October '08
(Part 2)
by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 22
Overview of the DOCDEX issues and Opinions discussed at the ICC Banking Commission
(Part 1
)
by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 21
UCP 600 - in 2008

by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 20
Uniform Rules for Bank-to-Bank Reimbursements
New Publication Number 725 to become effective October 1, 2008

by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 19
Final review of UCP opinions reviewed by the ICC Banking Commission in April 2008

by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 18
More UCP opinions reviewed by the ICC Banking Commission

by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 17
To refuse or not to refuse!

by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 16
Another User Speaks on UCP 600 and News on ICC Events in India and Sri Lanka

by Gary Collyer and Doris Andersen

 

Issue 15
Users voice their concerns and issues with language seen in UCP 600 LCs

by Gary Collyer and Jack Chan

 

Issue 14
2007 the year of UCP 600

by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 13
UCP 600 - Application and Questions relating to Articles 18 and 26-29

by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 12
UCP 600 two months old and modifications or exclusions are occurring

by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 11
Documents are arriving .. how to apply articles 15-17

by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 10
The waiting is over and the real work now begins

by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 9
UCP seminars prompt similar types of questions and issues on a global basis - Part 3

by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 8
UCP seminars prompt similar types of questions and issues on a global basis - Part 2

by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 7
UCP seminars prompt similar types of questions and issues on a global basis.

by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 6
The clock is ticking towards July 1.

by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 5
UCP 600 seminars and workshops begin in earnest

by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 4
ICC Opinions shape the UCP revision - Part 2

by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 3
ICC Opinions shape the UCP revision - Part 1

by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 2
Responses to 9 "Key Issues" help shape the UCP 600

by Gary Collyer

 

Issue 1
The origins of the UCP revision

by Gary Collyer

 

UCP Revision
-Current Issues

by Gary Collyer